The Duke debacle

 

The crotch of controversy.

Over the weekend, my friend Rob Fahey posted this editorial on GamesIndustry.biz, later published on Eurogamer. It’s about Duke Nukem Forever’s ‘Capture the Babe’ mode, which is, as you’re probably aware, a variant of Capture the Flag in which teams compete to carry a tied-up woman to their base, administering the occasional slap on the behind to calm her down if she wriggles.

I don’t really want to talk about Duke Nukem. I’ve been asked to write an editorial on it, but I declined – partly because none of us have actually seen the game yet, and partly because I tend not to engage too much with women and games issues, for reasons I’ll go into later. But what really interests me about this issue isn’t Capture the Babe mode itself. It’s people’s reactions to the controversy, and what that says about us.

The comments thread in this article makes for astonishing reading – it’s at nearly 600 comments at the time of writing. If you object to Capture the Babe, you’re a Guardian-reading bleeding-heart PC-brigade apologist with overdeveloped sensitivities to harmless, satirical entertainment. If you don’t object to it, you’re a knuckle-dragging mono-browed guffawing imbecile who thinks it’s funny to hit women. There is apparently no middle ground. This, it seems, is a politically polarising issue – it goes beyond what you think of videogames and starts to become relevant to who you are as a person.

Most of Eurogamer’s commenters – who, according to readership data, are overwhelmingly adult men – rallied against Rob’s views. A few resorted to questioning his masculinity and journalistic credentials, but most came up with reasoned, intelligent but nonetheless passionately dissenting responses. Many of them were genuinely appalled by the suggestion that Capture the Babe was misogynist.

This vociferous defensiveness is something I’ve encountered in real life, too, and I’ve found myself fascinated by what’s behind it. In the aftermath of an unnecessarily heated argument that I recently had about Capture the Babe, I was offered a plausible answer. The guys who support Duke Nukem’s right to do what it wants – intelligent, socialised men – resent being lumped in with neanderthals at least as much, if not more, than those who oppose Capture the Babe resent its content.

I think this is what’s behind the sheer force of the negative reaction to Rob’s editorial. Eurogamer’s commenters took deep, personal offence at even the inference that they might be women-hating pricks for thinking Capture the Babe is harmless. That is, after all, a pretty serious accusation to make about someone’s character, even if you’re only doing so by association.

Thing is, though, the other side has its reasons too. It’s all about context, and I find it extremely easy to understand why you’d be moved enough by Capture the Babe to plant your feet firmly on the ground and take a stand against it. I wanted to provide a few examples from my own life to illustrate why.

I’ve been writing about games professionally about five years, but I’ve been a Girl On The Internet for much, much longer than that. I know what it’s like for people to think you’re less of a person because of your gender: that your opinions don’t deserve as much respect, that your viewpoint can’t possibly be relevant, that you’re either an attention-seeking slut or an ugly fat bitch because you play online. I am convinced that it is a tiny minority of people who think like this – but equally, you won’t find a female gamer who hasn’t encountered it in some form.

There’s a reason I started writing under Keza MacDonald as a teenager, rather than Kelly. It’s an established nickname, sure – my family and friends almost all call me Keza – but it’s also more gender-neutral than Kelly. It’s not that I was ashamed of my gender. I just wanted to talk about videogames, and I knew that doing so under an obviously female name would only get me unwanted grief or attention. I just didn’t want the hassle.

Similarly, as a journalist, I’ve always stayed the hell away from women in games issues because I’ve never thought that my gender makes my opinion on anything more or less relevant. I also think that the best way to deal with the ‘issue’ of women in the games industry is usually to behave as if it’s not an issue at all – which is the ideal state of events that we’re all shooting for. Drawing attention to particularly objectionable incidences of sexism in games doesn’t often do much except fuel the fire.

But the truth is that there is a lot of sexism in games, and at times it really gets on one’s tits, for want of a better expression. I wouldn’t usually class it as misogyny, because it’s so infrequently intentional. We’ve got Fumito Ueda saying that he doesn’t use female protagonists because girls wear skirts and aren’t as strong as boys, without really being aware of what that sounds like to a non-Japanese audience. Most of it is completely casual and intended to be harmless, and almost all of it IS harmless – but it’s insidious.

And sadly, these attitudes very, very occasionally extend to people who play games as well. As a seventeen-year-old staff writer, I had to listen to people at the publisher I worked at making jokes behind my back about how I must be sleeping with my editor to get the job. I’ve already mentioned the shit you have to contend with on Xbox Live, though the excellent website Fat, Ugly or Slutty does a much better job of illustrating the point. In comments threads, I have more than once been asked whether PMS might be affecting my judgement of a game. From speaking to other women in the games industry, I know that this stuff isn’t that uncommon.

This is the *less* unpleasant end of what we have to deal with.

The thing is that something like Capture the Babe can be the straw that breaks the camel’s back – the one incidence of casual sexism and puerility that finally makes you take a stand, like plenty of female commentators have. I think that was the case for Rob, too. He’s not female, but he’s as fed up as anyone else with the games industry’s mainstream image as an irrelevant or even potentially dangerous adolescent pastime, and things like Capture the Babe, in his view, do nothing to help.

What I’m trying to say here is that we all have good reasons for how we feel about issues like this. I’m amazed by the scale and ferociousness of this argument, and by how eager we all seem to be to jump down each other’s throats about it. I didn’t think that an argument about something as fundamentally silly as Duke Nukem could be so emotionally charged, and yet here we are. It’s worth thinking about why that is, and trying to explain why people are reacting to this the way they are.

As for Duke and his captured babes? On that front, I couldn’t possibly offer an opinion. I haven’t played it yet.

7 Comments

Filed under London

7 Responses to The Duke debacle

  1. Absolutely bloody excellent. You basically said all the things I want to say on the matter. Being a girl gamer is a pain in the arse some of the time, but thankfully I don’t play online that much (mainly because when I do I get abuse – me being bad at a game isn’t to do with being a girl, I’m just usually terrible! haha) If you win, you’re a “fucking slutcunt”. If you lose, “that’s why girls shouldn’t play games”. And to get back to the Nukem issue, I know it’s pretty un-femenist to say so, but I don’t really care. Duke Nukem is not a real person, so he can be made to do whatever. It’s only total morons that will emulate him anyway, and thankfully I don’t associate myself with them. It won’t help female gamers to be taken more seriously, but really I don’t think it could get any worse as it is anyway.

  2. TBH, you’d be called a fucking ‘slutcunt’ irrespective of gender, ‘nigger’ irrespective of ethnicity and ‘homo’ irrespective of sexuality. Online gaming – particularly on consoles – is a wonderfully juvenile and offensive place within which to experience all different kinds of hatred of abuse.

    Keza – a good, well reasoned and interesting piece. I think there are two pieces here, though – 1) real life maliciousness, sexism and anthingelseism and 2) online etiquette. The latter, in the coming decade or so, is certainly going to bleed into the former – we’re beginning to see it coming through already in people’s attitudes and behaviours, and unfortunately it’s only going to get worse.

    In terms of the real life side of things, I’m male so have been spared much of the humiliation. My wife, on the other hand, worked in a predominantly male environment until recently (a qualified physicist, she did various measurements on various things in large scale engineering environments). On top of whisperings of affairs with colleagues following business trips, lude comments and openly suggestive advances, she too had to fight to prove herself to her male colleagues when her successes spoke for themselves.

    Many of those people would behave similarly; mortally offended if confronted (even by me) and unreservedly apologetic, followed by passionate and (un)reasoned debate regarding the validity of their comments or their right to to spout them. Political Correctness Gone Mad was pedalled out more than once.

    The biggest issue here is one you allude to, however; the lack of awareness of the game at large. Tone and setting are critical, but Duke Nukem as it was is a character of another era, a deconstruction of the 80′s action hero with tongue very firmly in cheek. Done in the “right way”, there’s some validity there.

    That tone doesn’t work so well right now, however. The 90′s were a period of reasonable prosperity and security, now is anything but. Rambo, Expendables et al are being pedalled out and celebrated, a return to brash, broad stereotypes being appluaded for the simple and single minded motivations. And killing.

    Duke Nukem doesn’t belong in the now, nor do his predelictions for quips, sexism or gentle slaps on the rump.

    (There’s probably a whole piece where this links to the general trends in porn as well, but I wouldn’t know about that).

  3. Interesting blog. I think that when talking about sexism towards women in games, women naturally have an insight into the offensiveness of something or not – though I’d also respect that no female journalist has an obligation to stand up and be counted. Personally, this whole thing makes me uncomfortable, but I’m not a woman, so there are aspects of this debate which are simply beyond my intuitive understanding. And while I respect Fahey’s opinion and his points are no more or less sound for being a man, his opinion is of less interest to me than a woman’s. Because he cannot help but be a man, he cannot know what it feels like to be a woman. Same applies in reverse.

    Anyway, I know I won’t draw you out on the matter, but I agree that this is more an issue of context than anything else. It depends on whether we are deriving enjoyment out of how ridiculous Duke is, so he becomes the centre of the joke, or whether it’s played completely straight. If it’s the latter, I don’t think it flies.

  4. Dan Griliopoulos A lot of this is post-hoc reasoning, which I think was talking to you about at the glow-in-the-dark dodgeball; people tend to have their emotional response first, then attempt to justify it logically from more universal premises afterwards; to me, doing that is just dressing their prejudice up in fancy language and I’d rather they were just honest about their prejudices. A lot of people review games that way too (mea culpa). We should be examining arguments and structures first for flaws, then criticizing them on the basis of that, not realising hate then making up reasons to hate. If you find yourself having that emotional response you should disavow it; focus on introspection, not justification.

  5. Namestar

    The source of most misunderstandings in this case and in my opinion is that several arguments that are not distinct but are nevertheless not one argument got lumped together:

    Are video games predominantly sexist? Does it matter? Is Duke Nuke em sexist? Does _this_ matter? Is Rob’s reasoning for answering these questions valid? My answers would be yes, yes, yes, no, no respectively. If I wrote a comment on Eurogamer, I would be categorized among the misogynists for defending Duke Nuke em although I just find other games to be much worse when it comes to sexism and that’s all there is to it.

    I agree that the main reason the argument got heated is because the discussion became personal right from the start with accusations that if you like/dislike this, you must be of this/that character. But that’s mostly Rob’s fault and the point that illustrates this more clearly than any other is when he refers to Penny Arcade and calls their argument “stupid” offering a counter-argument (not being able to take Call of Duty seriously as opposed to Duke) that is so wrong, I wouldn’t even know how to answer to this, in the same way I wouldn’t have an answer to someone saying that the sun is black …after calling something else stupid.

    Everything after that went downhill, the lowest point being eurogamer staff high-fiving themselves on twitter and Rob believing that the existence of a bunch of stupid comments on eurogamer makes him or his texts more intelligent. Many or most comments are stupid but if the more intelligent ones don’t seem to be taken seriously, it will hurt eurogamer. Next time, intelligent people won’t even bother.

  6. Well written but I think you’ve missed the point that much of the umbrage taken with Rob came from the titles of the ‘article’ – Gearbox’ misstep with Duke’s Capture the Babe mode is likely to raise hell – and rightly so. Which is loaded with snobby opinion. Later he made some frankly stupid and offensive comments on his own twitter. Personally, the subject has been overblown from the very beginning but Rob’s attitude stinks and brings Eurogamer closer to the gutter.

  7. Banana

    An excellent post, and not just exclusive to women either. Just look at the comments section of Youtube videos made by anyone who doesn’t fit the white straight male demographic. Your viewpoint is automatically void because you are not the above – if you are a vaguely attractive girl you will get comments of a sexual nature; if unattractive you will be insulted. If you are non-white – well good luck rooting through all the racist insults to find that one comment actually talking about your vid. Never mind what your video was about, you don’t fit our expectations!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s